When Judge was Judged for giving Justice

 Judge interprets Law correctly, Penalised Justice Pushpa Ganediwal of Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) recently gave few judgments. FEMINISTS JUDGED THE JUDGE'S JUSTICE AND JUSTIFY HER REMOVAL FROM PROMOTION TO SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. As it is, the power of Feminists in India seems to be more than even CJI. See how, CJI needs to justify their courtroom exchange now a days, which feminists objected to. There are 3 major questions that came to us for our Opinion. Thanks to the Magazine for publishing our views, but then, it is imperative to detail our responses to those questions: Q.1. Do you agree that the condition of skin-to-skin contact is justified to constitute the offence under Section 8 of the POCSO Act? Our Response : The act is clearly defined in terms of the "touch" the specific body parts as an offence under the specific section. Every Kind of a wrong touch, has a different gravity and different punishment. In the said judgment, unfortunately, the Media has re-

Blame Court/Police for Misuse - Feminist Hoax

MISUSE OF RAPE LAWS, BLAME POLICE/COURT ANOTHER FEMINIST HOAX Pick up any debate/online discussion around Misuse of Rape laws or Misuse of Gender Biased Laws, the only thing feminists do, is to point fingers at alleged "incapability" of the " SYSTEM ". System, for them, is the Police and Court. Rape laws are one of the most misused laws with various courts giving various observations like:   While Courts have been doing their bit in giving whatever little justice is available to those who are falsely accused, majority of the victims of false accusations suffer the wrath of the abuse of process of law and being the victims on most touchy topic, gender, in the country. The moment there is an issue which can be converted to a Gender identity, Politics, Society, Authorities jump into it carrying the "flag of change". Most of such actions result into change of laws, like we have seen the changes to the Rape Laws. Changes in 2012, 201