Save Family Foundation Commando Training Sessions

It's been a while since I penned down a blog. Sorry for going missing. Though, the current times are way too critical to not write about it. All of us have witnessed the tragic suicide or the society sponsored murder of #AtulSubhash. While many Tweets, Videos, Podcasts, News Reports, TV debates have been triggered with this, a huge feminist undercurrent is developing where they are witnessed conveniently blaming either #AtulSubhash himself or the Men's Rights Activists. Have seen some ironic videos from feminists saying " these Men's Rights Activists having nothing on Atul Subhash case and are just using it " USING IT?? Really?? If that's the case, that should mean that Feminists USED "Nirbhaya", USED "Shah Bano", USED many females?? Raising the issue, pleading for your survival = USED (as per Feminist dictionary) One #AtulSubhash case made it to viral media while lakhs and lakhs of #AtulSubhash got a silent, unnoticed, ignored exit from th...

 Judge interprets Law correctly, Penalised Justice Pushpa Ganediwal of Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) recently gave few judgments. FEMINISTS JUDGED THE JUDGE'S JUSTICE AND JUSTIFY HER REMOVAL FROM PROMOTION TO SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. As it is, the power of Feminists in India seems to be more than even CJI. See how, CJI needs to justify their courtroom exchange now a days, which feminists objected to. There are 3 major questions that came to us for our Opinion. Thanks to the Magazine for publishing our views, but then, it is imperative to detail our responses to those questions: Q.1. Do you agree that the condition of skin-to-skin contact is justified to constitute the offence under Section 8 of the POCSO Act? Our Response : The act is clearly defined in terms of the "touch" the specific body parts as an offence under the specific section. Every Kind of a wrong touch, has a different gravity and different punishment. In the said judgment, unfortunately, the Media has re-...

6th National Meet - Agra 14-16 August 2014 Hotel Clarks Shiraz, Agra DAY 1 DAY 2 IMAGES

FOR THOSE WHO ASK "NO NEWS ABOUT MEN?" It was starting of 2013 and I had been using a smartphone application for talking to my friends. Then I thought, if I can add my friends, they WHY NOT MY NEW FAMILY? Thus, started the new smartphone group, namely, "Law Misuse Commandos". A channel, a medium, that allowed over 30+ (now 41) Nationwide commandos from various Men's Rights Organizations, combination of new and old members, to come on a single Platform. Though we started discussing activism and activities, but graudally, all group members got into the habit of selecting News Articles which mattered to us (For us / Unhappy Feminists OR Happy Feminists / Sad us). But whatever it was, the activity continued. With this blog, I am hereby updating those clicks which mattered, which either acted as the spark or the iginition, acted as the fire, as the force and led to various serious discussions, knowledge/experience sharing between this Nation...

HOW CAN 1+2+5=100% In continuation to our endevor to help victims of law misuse the help that no one offers, we did another session of Commando Training Session. May 2013, on Saturday, we got 3 experts who talked about the Criminal Proceedings involved with a Family Court, YES, the experts talked about CrPC 125. What is CrPC 125? 125. Order for maintenance of wives, children and parents. (1) If any person leaving sufficient means neglects or refuses to maintain- (a) his wife, unable to maintain herself, or (b) his legitimate or illegitimate minor child, whether married or not, unable to maintain itself, or (c) his legitimate or illegitimate child (not being a married daughter) who has attained majority, where such child is, by reason of any physical or mental abnormality or injury unable to maintain itself, or (d) his father or mother, unable to maintain himself or herself, A Magistrate of’ the first class may, upon proof of such neglect or refusal, order such pe...