Blame Court/Police for Misuse - Feminist Hoax

MISUSE OF RAPE LAWS, BLAME POLICE/COURT

ANOTHER FEMINIST HOAX

Pick up any debate/online discussion around Misuse of Rape laws or Misuse of Gender Biased Laws, the only thing feminists do, is to point fingers at alleged "incapability" of the "SYSTEM".

System, for them, is the Police and Court.

Rape laws are one of the most misused laws with various courts giving various observations like:

 

While Courts have been doing their bit in giving whatever little justice is available to those who are falsely accused, majority of the victims of false accusations suffer the wrath of the abuse of process of law and being the victims on most touchy topic, gender, in the country.

The moment there is an issue which can be converted to a Gender identity, Politics, Society, Authorities jump into it carrying the "flag of change". Most of such actions result into change of laws, like we have seen the changes to the Rape Laws. Changes in 2012, 2013, 2017 which have eventually given us current law as:

1. Gender Biased.

2. Making sexual assault of 16-18 years boys, lesser punishment than same age girls [Yes, Rape law differs in the quantum of punishment, based on gender of the victim, AND AGAINST BOYS].

3. Turning the earlier law into a draconian, easy to misuse tool against men.

THOUGH, IT IS IRONICAL TO KNOW THAT THE SAME FEMINISTS WHO BRUSH AWAY THE ISSUE OF MISUSE AND BLAME IT ON POLICE/COURTS, USED THE SAME ARGUMENT AS "ANTICIPATED MISUSE BY MEN" TO CHANGE THE 2013 ORDINANCE FROM GENDER NEUTRAL SEXUAL ASSAULT LAW TO CURRENT DRACONIAN, GENDER BIASED RAPE LAW.

You would also come across the pointers that Feminists give against Police & Courts about their seriousness in dealing with Rape cases and using that HOAX, they have ben successful in:

1. Training Police to be Justice averse, female Gender pleasing authority.

2. Training Judiciary, in name of Gender Sensitization, re-write/re-author/re-word the old judgments and to write judgments in a specific way, which is pro-women.

3. AS SEEN LATELY IN CASE OF KARNATAKA HC JUDGMENT, expunge comments from the court, given on an instant litigant [Though, Courts using similar comments about men, everyone is happy to ignore!!]

So, we decided to do a short check on the reality of the misuse of the Rape Laws. And here is the summary of our limited findings:

FIRSTLY: THE PERCENTAGE OF THE RAPE CASES, FILED ON THE ALLEGATION OF FALSE PROMISE OF MARRIAGE HAVE RISEN FROM 22% OF TOTAL CASES IN 2015 TO 38% IN 2018. This is a humungous jump of 16% in 4 years time.

Data from NCRB (Ministry of Home Affairs) from 2015 to 2018

Few other important things to note, as per the graph is the declining trend of the total rape cases and rising trend of "False Promise of Marriage" Rape cases.

As a renowned MRA, Mr. WA mentioned recently, women are considered super women, when they are pushed in Corporate world or Law Making or even otherwise in the society. But the same women are considered with no maturity to have indulged into consensual sex, purely based on a promise?? Is this fair? Should we consider women as mature or immature? Theories based on convenience are spread across, by feminists.

SECONDLY: FEMINISTS BLAME POLICE/COURT FOR ALLEGED LACKSIDAL APPROACH TOWARDS RAPE CASES & ALSO BLAME THEM FOR "LITTLE" MISUSE. IT IS A BLATANT LIE.

In this analysis, we have compared the available data (for 5 years, 2014 to 2018) on:

1. Chargesheeting by Police

2. Pendency of cases at Police level

3. Pendency of cases at Court level (Sessions Court)

4. Conviction rate of Cases

Comparison is done between IPC 376 (Rape cases), Total Crime Against Women (IPC) Cases & IPC 302 (Murder cases).

The reason that we have used IPC 302 is because it is considered under category of violent crime and to make the investigation difficult, the victim is not alive at all. So, it is a fair assumption that investigation of a Murder case is definitely difficult than Rape cases, for the simple reason of the victim be dead or alive respectively.

Police Chargesheeting rate from 2014 to 2018, as per NCRB

Findings:

• Chargesheeting rate in case of Rape law is much higher than Chargesheeting rate in Murder law. 
• Also, Rape cases take priority on Chargesheeting, more than the other Crime Against Women cases. Then comparatively, Police should rather be appreciated for their more focussed action on Rape complaints.
• THIS CLEARLY DEPICTS, Police is definitely more focussed in Chargesheeting accused in case of Rape as against Murder Law.
• THIS FURTHER PROVES, focus of Police to take the accused to courts is higher in case of Rape, than in case of Murder. So, the FEMINIST HOAX, saying that Police is not serious on Rape cases, is definitely caught from this data.

Police Pendency rate from 2014 to 2018, as per NCRB 

Findings:

• Murder cases have much higher pendency (police investigating) than Crime Against Women cases while Rape cases have lowest pendency of the 3 categories. 
• THIS CLEARLY DEPICTS, Police is definitely more focussed in investigating Rape cases as against other CAW cases and much more focussed than Murder cases.
• THIS FURTHER PROVES that dead victim has a lower priority, based on gender, when it comes to Police investigations. So, the FEMINIST HOAX, saying that Police delays Rape cases, is caught red handed here as well. Police is over efficient in Rape cases, compared to Murder cases.

Trial Courts (Sessions) Pendency rate from 2014 to 2018, as per NCRB

Findings:

• Murder cases have much higher pendency (Court Trials) than Crime Against Women cases while Rape cases have lowest pendency of the 3 categories. 
• THIS CLEARLY DEPICTS, Courts are definitely more focussed in running trials of Rape cases as against other CAW cases and much more focussed than Murder cases.
• THIS FURTHER PROVES that dead victim has a lower priority, based on gender, when it comes to Court's priority list. So, the FEMINIST HOAX, saying that Courts delay Rape cases, is caught red handed here as well. Courts are forced to be over efficient in Rape cases, compared to Murder cases. 

Conviction rate from 2014 to 2018, as per NCRB

Findings:

• PREMISE:
• Indian Evidence Act, Section 114A - Presumption of Guilty, in case of IPC 376
• Same Police Department investigates in both Rape cases or Murder cases
• Same state/prosecution fights as Petitioner in both Rape and Murder cases
• Both Rape and Murder cases are tried in Sessions Court
• Police and Courts have higher priority proven to Rape Cases than Murder cases
• Police chargesheets higher % in Rape cases, than in Murder cases
• Courts finish trials of Rape cases in more focussed manner, than Murder cases, resulting in a lower pendency comparatively
• Police investigates Rape cases with higher focus, compared to Murder cases. Murder cases pendency rate is thus, higher
• Inspite of so much focus, push, society pressure, Rape law conviction rates are almost half of that of Murder cases.
• What does this mean??
• It only means, FEMINIST BLAMING POLICE OR COURT FOR LOWER CONVICTION IS A BLATANT LIE AS THE SAME COURTS, SAME POLICE, SAME STATE HAVE PROVEN TO HAVE MUCH HIGHER CONVICTION IN MURDER CASES.

So, next time a feminist tries to blame Police/Court/State for misuse or poor investigation, just show them this mirror with this data.

AT THE END, I FIRMLY BELIEVE, MISUSE OF LAW IS MOSTLY AT THE HANDS OF THE PERSON FILING A FALSE CASE. STOP BLAMING THE CATALYSTS AND START ATTRIBUTING THE RESPONSIBILITY TO THOSE, WHO ARE ACTUALLY RESPONSIBLE i.e. THE FALSE ACCUSER.